Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 8
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 2, 2026.
Public comments (8)
Requested that homes backing up to existing properties be offset so neighbors are not staring directly window-to-window.
Planning Commission | — September 2, 2026 · 55:25 →Raised concerns about neighborhood park size, heavy traffic near the high school, and difficulties turning left from Rio Grande onto 100 South.
Planning Commission | — September 2, 2026 · 57:19 →Supported lot offsetting to preserve mountain views and echoed traffic and home height concerns.
Planning Commission | — September 2, 2026 · 1:00:29 →Objected to the lower R-9 zoning density compared to surrounding third-acre lots, arguing it could lower property values.
Planning Commission | — September 2, 2026 · 1:02:38 →Stated that traffic bottlenecks on Spanish Fork Parkway and 100 South are severe and requested a thorough traffic study.
Planning Commission | — September 2, 2026 · 1:04:33 →Noted extreme traffic delays during high school dismissal and expressed skepticism that a roundabout would function smoothly with teenagers.
Planning Commission | — September 2, 2026 · 1:07:42 →Expressed deep safety concerns for elementary students walking to Sierra Bonita across busy streets without bus service, suggesting a pedestrian tunnel.
Planning Commission | — September 2, 2026 · 1:10:19 →Expressed worry that temple and meetinghouse parking is already insufficient and that the development would take away church green space.
Planning Commission | — September 2, 2026 · 1:13:28 →